commit 65434502db2db049fd004c389d2ab5ab1ba21e6a
parent f1c9dbab660bd55adff913bef1486f556ab781cf
Author: Ivan Gankevich <i.gankevich@spbu.ru>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:16:54 +0300
Fix figures.
Diffstat:
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
@@ -41,9 +41,17 @@ build/gnuplot/%.svg: gnuplot/%.gnuplot
@mkdir -p build/gnuplot
gnuplot -d $<
-build/ships/%.svg: ships/%.gnuplot gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot
+build/ships/diogen.svg: ships/diogen.gnuplot gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot
@mkdir -p build/ships
- gnuplot -d -c gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot $< $@
+ gnuplot -d -c gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot $< $@ Diogen
+
+build/ships/aurora.svg: ships/aurora.gnuplot gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot
+ @mkdir -p build/ships
+ gnuplot -d -c gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot $< $@ Aurora
+
+build/ships/micw.svg: ships/micw.gnuplot gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot
+ @mkdir -p build/ships
+ gnuplot -d -c gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot $< $@ MICW
build:
@mkdir -p build
diff --git a/gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot b/gnuplot/vessel.gnuplot
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ set view equal xyz
set view ,,4
#set object 1 rectangle from screen -0.1,-0.1 to screen 1.1,1.1 fillcolor rgb "#f0f0f0" behind
unset key
-set title ARG1
+set title ARG3 offset 0,-3
#unset border
#unset xtics
#unset ytics
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ set zrange [*:40]
set xzeroaxis
set yzeroaxis
set zzeroaxis
+set xlabel 'x, m'
+set ylabel 'y, m'
+set zlabel 'z, m'
set output ARG2
splot ARG1
#splot 'Aurora.vsl.gnuplot' with lines lw 0.1 lc 'black'
diff --git a/review.org b/review.org
@@ -1,18 +1,15 @@
* DONE Review 1
-CLOSED: [2020-06-20 Sat 12:00]
-
-- [X] Fig. 2 and table 3 are placed after the references. They should be
- inserted into the text of the paper.
-- [X] Table 3 is mentioned before the table 2 (see paragraphs 2 and 3 on page 8
- of the text).
+CLOSED: [2020-06-20 Sat 15:04]
+It would be highly desirable for the authors to provide the overview of the
+other works concerning the same topic. It would help to understand the place of
+the proposed model in the common row of the models simulating air flow around
+ship hull and estimate the anvantages and disadvantages of the presented model.
* DONE Review 2
-CLOSED: [2020-06-20 Sat 13:36]
+CLOSED: [2020-06-20 Sat 15:02]
-There a few are minor remarks to improve the paper:
-- [X] Related work is not analyzed in detail, Related work section is missing at all
-- [X] Plots in figures 1 and 2 have neither designation not measurement units of
- axes
-- [X] Table 3 and Fugure 2 after References look weird, try to incorporate them into
- the main body of the paper
+The paper is well written and the topic is very interesting. The only
+misunderstanding is about Figure 4 and Table 3. They are at the end of the
+paper, but cited in the middle. There are no words about the appendix. But it
+does not influence on the impression of the paper.
